Showing posts with label Roger Oldham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roger Oldham. Show all posts

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Best Cooperative Program article in decades

I have followed the Cooperative Program for almost forty years - thirty years as a pastor, a few years on both ends of that as a seminarian and retiree, respectively.

The article below by Roger S. Oldham, SBC Executive Committee Vice President for Convention Communications and Relations, is the best I have seen in all these years in its reporting on and explanation of our venerable Cooperative Program.

National CP Shows Signs of Rebounding

The article is the headline for the most recent SBCLife: Journal of the Southern Baptist Convention that the Executive Committee of the SBC publishes five times each year.

The SBC Executive Committee is one of the most forthright of our SBC entities. There hasn't been much good news in a long time on the CP but the Executive Committee has monthly press releases that accurately tell Southern Baptists what is transpiring in regard to CP receipts from the state conventions.

"Big deal," you say?

It is a big deal to have accurate reporting. Declining metrics are like poison to SBC pastors, churches, state conventions, and entities. All of these commonly and routinely finesse or spin bad news. I once knew of a church that, after years of stellar growth in their Sunday School, saw attendance figures level off and then begin declining. Solution to that? Stop reporting attendance numbers in the church bulletin and newsletter. Problem solved. Other churches in similar situations start rationalizing padding the numbers so that the decline is not readily noticed by members.

One thing every SBC pastor and layperson learns to understand is that at times it has been extremely difficult to get straightforward numbers and straight talk from state convention executives and entity leaders. I am not asserting that any individual is dishonest, but rather that executives regularly and routinely spin their numbers to the point where reality is disguised to the average SBC pastor or layperson.

The reason this piece by Sing Oldham is a great article is that it is honest, straightforward, and educational. In the article one finds,


  • The latest encouraging news on CP giving, receipts are slightly but notably up for this fiscal year, is offered with the accurate backdrop of the last five years of declining membership, per capita CP giving, total CP giving, national CP receipts, and national per capita CP gifts.
  • More important than the last five years of numbers is the splendid explanation of CP history. Seldom do state conventions take time to explain some of the arcana regarding state/national CP splits much less the history of how the states came to gobble up well beyond half of CP receipts.
  • Recent important decisions by the various state conventions are noted, tabulated, and explained. More about this in a subsequent.
I was one ignorant pastor for about the first half of my pastoral ministry. I knew the basics about the CP but I knew little about the intricacies of  the state/national relationships and nothing about how the states handled the accounting. As a result, when I would attend forums where state executives talked about how the CP was such a great shared revenue program, I didn't know enough to recognize when state leaders would deflect or finesse questions by pastors about the state/national division of the monies.  

Ten minutes of reading this is worth ten years of press releases, cheerleading, and the relentless CP spin that pastors usually hear.

Future articles:
  • How state conventions managed to avoid the goal of an ideal 50/50 state/national CP split for the entire life of the Cooperative Program
  • How many state conventions are dispensing with the fuzzy accounting presentation techniques and moving to the ideal goal with straight up accounting.






Monday, December 13, 2010

Baptist Press unleashed...or shorter leash?

Baptist Press, that venerable news outfit that we've been used to for all these decades is yet again shuffled around in the grand scheme of SBC things. You'll have to go to Associated Baptist Press to get a brief summary of the history of changes in where BP fits in the SBC organizational chart, and that's part of the problem, having to go outside of BP to find some news.

Baptist Press will do their work directed by a veteran news guy, Art Toalston, who works under two non-news guys, Roger "Sing" Oldham, Vice President for Convention Communications and ultimately Frank Page, CEO of our Executive Committee.

The change cuts some high dollar positions out of the Executive Committee staff (although two notable high dollar positions, that of Ken Hemphill and Bobby Welch, should receive scrutiny, particularly the former, if we're serious about saving a few hundred thousand here and there), which I like. But will BP thrive, improve, stay the same, or decline in this new slot?

Guess we will have to wait and see.

BP's ultimate leader, Frank Page makes it clear that there will be no micromanaging of Baptist Press, so reports Baptist Press, BP won't be micromanaged, Page says. We can be forgiven if we wait and see if he means what he says.

Baptist Press is, well, I'm not sure what. It should be the SBC’s news source but for some time it has fallen short of that. Perhaps we could call Baptist Press the SBC’s limited journalistic effort at reporting to Southern Baptists and others some news of note.

Seems to me, and I’ve read BP for decades and have gotten every news feed BP emails out for years, that you can expect BP not to cover some news that is noteworthy to the religious press because it is negative to Southern Baptists. Perhaps that is unfair. It is my subjective opinion. Recently, some people complained about BP being unfair and unbalanced in the reporting about the Great Commission Task Force the past couple of years. Perhaps.

Isn't it ironic that BP is criticized today for story selection, what to write about and what to ignore, just like it was 20 years ago when its leaders were fired because the powers that be didn't like their story selection?


Neither Page nor Oldham have journalistic experience. Both are good men. Perhaps they will do the right thing and give BP enough independence to be something other than an SBC puff publication. We've got SBC Life for that.

It remains to be seen if BP will thrive or be stifiled in this arrangement. One has to admit that while the organization chart has been changed, there isn’t much difference between Morris Chapman having BP under his authority and Frank Page.

Frank, Sing…let the guys go with the news wherever it comes from and wherever it takes us.

Frankly, I’m tired of having to read Associated Baptist Press to get stuff BP didn’t cover but should have.