Showing posts with label SBC Name change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SBC Name change. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

The SBC: Always the best show in town

I don't think our grand denominationcould stand something like the SBC annual meeting more than a couple of days each year.

A few observations:


Election of Fred Luter was an authentic, unadulterated, genuine moment. We SBCers deserve one of those occasionally.

The name change debate was a curiosity (I watched it live, in my basement of course). The SBC has always been a convention full of  parliamentarians. Barry McCarty is worth the big bucks we pay him.

Face time is always important to some obscure SBCers but we are all equal at the annual meeting and if you can grab a mic you have as much right to display your nonsense as anyone else.

The name non-change vote will be forthcoming but I suppose it will have passed comfortably but not overwhelmingly. Then 90% of us can forget about that and those who have been all exercised about it can find something else to get apoplectic about.

Bryant Wright has always seemed to hit the proper notes. He is easily the best presiding officer since Adrian Rogers.

We will see what Frank Page has in mind on a Calvinist/Traditionalist "panel." There are some traditionalists who are rather militant. I'm not sure where this is going.

While we are at it, I like Wright's gentle admonition of the Calvinists: To our Calvinist friends: A bit of humility would be most welcome. Wonder where he got the idea that such was lacking?

To be fair, Wright's admonition of Traditionalists: It is time to show some respect for those of differing views when it comes to election and when it comes to salvation." 

It will be interesting to see how many votes blogger Dave Miller can pull this morning. He is well known among the blogging tribe and not known as a heavily partisan figure, nor a bomb thrower or troublemaker. If I were present he would have my vote. I like him. He has a sense of humor and he needs encouraging after his beloved Yankees got beaten by the Atlanta Braves last night.


Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Will GCB die a quiet death?

Shall it be “GCB Plodder” instead of SBC Plodder?

Uh…no.

I rather like beginning our name with the hiss of the sibilant “S” in Ssssssouthern Baptist Convention. Doesn’t SsssssssBC roll nicely right off the tongue? Sort of a soft 'hisssss'.

Speaking of which, veteran SBCers are able detect a steady hiss of disapproval for any significant idea put forth from on high in the Sssssouthern Baptist Convention and the hissing of bloggers far and wide is constant in our Baptist background. I hear it on the non-name change.

I sense ambivalence about the matter, although not a few approve of the action since it gives us a way for churches to avoid enunciating the “S” word if they think it harmful.

Since I don’t deal with people who instinctively hold me at arms length when they find out I am SBC, I make no judgment about the advantage of a nickname for the SBC. Should some feel it helpful, I’m for going along.

Would anyone dispute that we have a way in the SBC of taking perfectly good terms and phrases and absolutely wearing them out.  I offer as evidence the ubiquitous Baptist term “missions.” In my state every nickel that is spent is “missions” and every employee is a state “missionary.”

Get the point?

But I’m trying to imagine a conversation about the nickname.

 “Oh, I’m a Great Commission Baptist.”

“What’s that?”
“Well, it’s what some of us call the Southern Baptist Convention.”

“I see.”

“You do?”

“Not really, but whatever.” 
The dilemma is inescapable here. When the question is asked about what, who Great Commission Baptists are, the answer has to be forthright. I wouldn't do to finesse it and deliberately hold back on  connecting it to the SBC, and thereby appear deceitful.
 

And we've got a disconnect here. If the purpose is both avoid negative reaction to SBC and also to create a good impression, "Great Commission Baptists" fails because it is far too obscure to all but those with a much higher level of Biblical familiarity. "Golden Rule Baptists" would work for this because the phrase is familiar to almost all.


And doesn't the name “Great Commission Baptists” sound decidedly generic? Insiders think and speak of autonomy but the greater public thinks of  the SBC as being heavily institutionalized. "Great Commission Baptists" sounds like a mob not an organization. Perhaps the committee is onto something there.

One might note the way in which news media, folks who actually get paychecks for reporting news, wrote of the Name Change Committee’s recommendation to the Executive Committee:

“Southern Baptists decide against name change”

“Southern Baptists will officially remain Southern Baptists”
“No Name Change For Southern Baptists” ‎ 

The headline news is that there will be no name change for the SBC, not that we have an add-on name.

Time will tell if the alternative name dies a quiet death or lives on with some degree of usefulness. I'm leaning towards the former.

Regardless, I will not be using the alternative name. If others find some value in it, God bless them.

You can take the 'Southern' out of SBC...

...but you can't credibly take the SBC out of the south:






...and this graphic includes all Baptists, not just SBC.

Any questions?

Thursday, February 9, 2012

An Interview with William Thornton

SBC Today has been doing some occasional interviews of prominent SBC leaders.

Hmmm, I haven’t gotten a call from them. Perhaps they don’t have my number or maybe I’m way down the list and scheduled for an interview two years after I die.

Not to worry. In an awesome display of personal power, I have convinced SBC Plodder to interview William Thornton. Here’s the interview. Enjoy.
________________________________

SBC Plodder: What do you think are the greatest challenges confronting the SBC?

William Thornton: The greatest challenge we have is the decades long decline of the Cooperative Program as a percentage of church offerings. No one would have predicted thirty years ago that churches would on average drop their CP gifts, as measured by the percentage of undesignated gifts, by 50% but that is what has happened. The economic travails of the past decade, especially the last three years, have been devastating to our cooperative work. The troublesome thing is that no one knows where the floor lies for that percentage. We cannot continue as we have for the past decades if this continues and addressing and overcoming that challenge is the most serious one that we face.

It is not too far fetched to say that the SBC as we have known it cannot continue if we don’t have some resolution to this matter.

And it’s not that I don’t hear denominational leaders talking about this but what they tend to do is to spiritualize the problem. Perhaps it is not their intent but blaming God in a backhanded way for not sending revival, faulting churches for lack of generosity, or casting a wistful eye at the halcyon years of CP giving now long in the past are not solutions.

I also hear many who blame state conventions for keeping too much of their CP dollar, although state conventions are at about where they have always been in keeping CP money in state.

It might help to stop whining and complaining and come up with a fresh approach to our critical funding stream. I don’t see anyone doing this.

Also, Calvinism is an issue and a challenge but I wouldn’t put it at the top of the list as Frank Page did. I have one eyebrow raised here because of some of the things I see in churches with Calvinist pastors.

SBC Plodder: What do you see as the greatest opportunities open to the SBC?

William Thornton: The greatest opportunities lie in the locales with the greatest numbers of lost people and that would be outside of North America. The SBC is blessed to have thousands of young people who feel called to this work, many of whom sacrifice some of their prime post-college years to live overseas and learn the difficult languages and cultures where the Gospel is needed. I think that we are wasting resources and squandering the opportunities that God is giving us in not recognizing God’s hand in this and marshalling all the resources we can to this work. We are not being good stewards here.

SBC Plodder: What are your thoughts about a possible SBC name change?

I have no strong objection to it so long as we retain the word “Baptist” in it and I understand that is what the name change committee intends to do. I don’t think it would be worth spending millions of dollars to accomplish. Aside from that, I’m rather ambivalent. We Southern Baptists have a penchant for grand, showy, simple solutions to complex problems. We like the idea of doing something big but largely symbolic followed by a declaration of victory. Then we go back to business as usual.

I hope the name change isn't one of those deals but I’m not expecting much in the way of results out of it.

SBC Plodder: How do you go about sermon preparation?

William Thornton: As of yesterday, I haven’t preached in more than two months, so I haven’t done a lot of sermon preparation lately. Perhaps you could put my name out there for some pulpit supply. Thanks.

SBC Plodder: What is your evaluation of contemporary preaching?

William Thornton: I don’t think you can put contemporary preaching in a single category and address it. I hear some contemporary preaching that is very good, very solid, and very biblical. I hear other that seems to make a fetish out of the use of media, popular culture, provocative statements, and current fads. The latter leaves me cold and leaves Scripture behind, although it has proven to be good entertainment. While I am not a technophobe, I hate to see us act as if there was not great power in simple proclamation apart from all the ancillary technology and contemporary culture stuff.

SBC Plodder: What is the key to being a faithful/effective/successful pastor?

William Thornton: The key is to love God and love your congregation. That covers everything.

SBC Plodder: What is one key mistake that you see pastors and/or church staff members making that causes them problems in their churches?

William Thornton: Almost all SBC pastors will spend their career in small churches as single staff. Such ministry is almost completely relational so the pastor had better develop some skills in building, maintaining, and improving relationships.

Often the pastor sees himself as the ultimate authority in a church. Since most pastors don’t stay at a church long enough to have acquired the credibility, respect, and confidence of the church, they will never have the power and authority that they belive should automatically comes with their position; consequently, they would do well to acquire some problem solving skills. If the pastor sees himself as the ultimate authority come what may, that will be a problem.

You’ll have to ask someone else about the 10 percent of churches that have heavy administrative demands.

SBC Plodder: Who are two or three of your “heroes in ministry”?

William Thornton: Adrian Rogers would be at the top of that list. I often wonder what he would be saying about Calvinism, about the gaggle of shirt-tailed contemporary pastor/rock stars, and other things.

I think that Gray Allison, founder and president of Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary is the single greatest figure among Southern Baptists of the latter half of the Twentieth Century although he will never get credit for it.

SBC Plodder: What is the toughest lesson you have learned in ministry?

William Thornton: Most of us thrive on being liked and appreciated but, alas, some church people aren’t keen on appreciating or even liking their pastor. That is a tough lesson to learn and live with. On the other hand, once you learn that lesson, you can choose to focus your efforts on pleasing God rather than all the people around you.

SBC Plodder: What are the most significant doctrinal issues that the church will struggle with over the next few decades?

William Thornton: I have come to the conclusion that some expressions of Calvinism are more of a concern than I thought a decade ago. I appreciate many who self-identify with that theology but I am wary of a good many as well. Established churches will have to make themselves informed on both the doctrines and the manner by which some seek to implement those doctrines in a local congregation. It looks to me like the farther down the Calvinist road that we go as a denomination, in our institutions and agencies, the more troublesome it will be for us.

I also think that the egalitarianism/complementarianism issue will prove to be far more of a problem as time passes. It’s not just the old issue of women as senior pastors, but the hyper-authoritarian, patriarchical approach to family and church life that will be a problem. On gender issues, Southern Baptists may be in danger of becoming either latter day Mormons or Neo-Muslims, something that is neither good nor necessary. I hate to see it.

SBC Plodder: What do you do for fun?

William Thornton: I fish and then like a good fisherman, I lie about it. I have been a serious bird watcher for about 25 years and have enjoyed birding on five continents. I enjoy reading and read about one book per week on a wide range of subjects. You can have your Kindle, I think a library is one of the most wonderful places on earth.

SBC Plodder: Anything else you would like to tell us about?

There is a certain very cute granddaughter…well, never mind.

Monday, January 2, 2012

2012 Predictions

My understanding is that Harold Camping, having endured the fate of every other person who predicted the return of Jesus, is pouting for the year 2012 and that the Mayan end-of-time prediction isn't until December, so I'm going ahead and make some 2012 predictions.

_____________________

North American Mission Board: In spite of many changes that left a good number of SBCers disenchanted, NAMB's Annie Armstrong Easter Offering for North American Missions will be up when the report is made for 2011, and by over a million dollars.

International Mission Board: Sorry, but the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for International Missions will show a decrease for 2011. Because 2012 is the centennial of Lottie's death, the IMB will vigorously promote the 2012 offering and will not stint on the dubious assertion that Lottie starved herself to death, even though the latest Lottie bio calls that into question.

Name Change: The Name Change Committee with offer what they see as a more palatable name for the SBC, “Southern” being the main culprit, but the convention in session will choose not to go along with the sanitized name.

SBC Politics: Fred Luter will be nominated for SBC prez and will win.

Calvinism: Calvinism will continue to be a divisive issue in the convention with more churches designating their Cooperative Program giving around Southeastern and Southern seminaries because of their strong Calvinistic bent.

Baptist Press BP will blithely press ahead with sports coverage and other irrelevant subjects and studiously ignore important stories that have real relevance to SBC pastors and churches.

Cooperative Baptist Fellowship The CBF will complete the re-engineering, re-jiggering, re-imagining of their struggling group. The results will be propounded with great enthusiasm but the result will be a moment, not a movement beyond what they have now.

Secular Politics: Barack Obama will be defeated in his re-election bid, in spite of backhanded support from many SBCers who eschew voting for the eventual president, Morman Mitt Romney.

Cooperative Program After a miniscule increase this year the Cooperative Program will show another decrease for fiscal 2011-2012.

Assorted miscellaneous predictions:

In spite of various worthies declaring complementarianism/egalitarianism to be a critical measure of a church or convention's health, a few serious and committed SBCers will begin to wander off the complementarian reservation.

Baptist Associations will continue to make news in their march toward complete irrelevance by dismissing churches for various reasons including Calvinism and female pastors.

Having completed a second term as SBC president, Bryant Wright will continue to be one of the SBC’s best megapastors and will not seek a denominational sinecure, not even a designer one just for him as was the case for some others.

No Southern Baptist of the female persuasion who is not married to or offspring of a prominent SBC pastor, institutional leader, or other figure will be appointed to any significant SBC role in 2012.

Monday, December 12, 2011

Name change committee sez we can continue to be 'Baptists'

Well...good. I was wondering if I could ever be comfortable saying that I was a proud non-southern, non-baptist, generic something-or-other.

SBC name change task force reaches decision

That's a real tickler of a headline by Baptist Press.

What decision?

Well, we're not exactly told but it (them?) was unanimous.

Jimmy Draper did say,
...the task force understands its charge is limited to reporting back to Wright and that no one believed the word "Baptist" should be removed from the convention's name.

Soooo...we will remain Baptists and that puts the matter back to Plodder's SBC Name Change Designer wherein you can mix some denominational terminology together but must keep "Baptist" in the mix.

We will just be guessing what the grand Name Change Committee will report to the SBC Executive Committee on February 20th.

Friday, September 30, 2011

Some genius will have to find a name

I suppose that there are genii in the SBC, though in short supply and we may need some fresh, new thinking if an acceptable name is to be found (or is already found, registered, and lying dormant for just the right moment when the Illustrious Informal Name Committee will bestow it upon a convention of sleepless, hand wringing, nail biting followers who just haven't had any epiphanies of appropriate appelations and dare I suggest that the disciples of alliteration may be lurking about on this prepared for a mighty mammoth alliterative blow?)

My list of possibilities, annotated (and we're keeping 'Baptist' until the bitter end):


Fellowship; as in Cooperative Baptist Fellowship?
Convention; ain't new, ain't sexy.
Association; already have these and they are becoming somewhat dinosaurish.
Body; as in 'deacon body'? A bit of an image to overcome, I think.
Christians; well, it fits some SBCers.
Union; SBCers are mostly GOP and eschew untions.
Confab; like, around the water cooler, or pastor's conferences.
Conference; we certainly do a lot of this.
Churches; allegedly the key part of SBC life.
Federation; a bit too retro CCCP for me.
Alliance; as in Alliance of Extremely Liberal Baptists?
Resource; too LifeWayish.
Global; Well, ok, but doesn't excite me.
American; already have one of these.
North American; maybe, kind of clunky.
International; got an entity with this.
Galactic; ask Bobby Welch on this.
Universal; theological seppuku
General; a bit too martial.
Great Commission; haven't we worn this out?
Evangelical; major baggage here
Conservative; already have one of these.
Biblical; redundant, though a third "B" would be neat: "BBB"
Cooperative; as in Cooperative Baptist Fellowship? (Maybe they're the geniuses)
World; not broad enough to hold all the SBC egos
Worldwide; nah
Kingdom; so...monarchial ('Oligarchy' would be a good fit, though)

Plodder confesses to being seriously flummoxed on the name and yields to his betters.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Appointment of SBC name change committee 'unprecedented'? Uh, no.

The argument that Bryant Wright’s action on the name change committee is unprecedented is factually incorrect.

Ed Young was first elected SBC president in June of 1992. That September he appointed not one but nine study groups to look in-depth at many SBC matters including theology, Cooperative Program, and many others.

Baptist Press, September 24, 1992

Facts are our friends, I’ve been told. Here are some friends.

SBC Name Change Designer

Southern (this part is out, done, toast, gone)
Baptist (this part is the third rail, untouchable)
Convention (Convention/schmonvention, whatever, who cares?)

Any made up, fake words would be unacceptable, e.g., LifeWay, GuideStone, LeaderCare.

Need I say that meaningless terms (e.g. "Cru") would not be acceptable.

This leaves small minds like mine with a fairly limited set of options. So, use the designer below by choosing one from the first group. Combine that with "Baptist" and then choose one from the third group. Creative options would add prepositions and jumble the order of the three terms.

Have at it.
_____________________

Global
American
North American
International
Galactic
Universal
General
Great Commission
Evangelical
Conservative
Biblical
Cooperative
World
Worldwide
Kingdom
Global
...plus...
BAPTIST
...plus...

Fellowship
Convention
Association
Body
Christians
Union
Confab
Conference
Churches
Federation
Alliance
Resource

Toss out the stuff already employed and the list narrows considerably. I welcome additional adjectives and nouns.

Monday, September 26, 2011

New SBC Name...Already Selected?

I'm doing what bloggers do best: speculate openly about matter about which we have no evidence. Why not?

I would not attribute to Bryant Wright the slightest amount of guile in his appointing of an informal committee to study and advise him on a possible SBC name change...but...the committee and the SBC has some very savvy people.

My question is this: Has someone already registered a new name, or a selection of new names, for possible SBC use?

There are only so many possibilities:

"Southern" This is the so-called offending part of our name. How many appropriate adjectives are available?

"Baptist" No one will touch this. It's the third rail of this matter. A new name without "Baptist" is DOA.

"Convention" Convention, fellowship...whatever. I'm ambivalent about this.

And what clever and resourceful blogger will be the first to ferret this out? Has the Executive Committee registered some names? Has some third party registered some names on behalf of the Executive Committee? Will someone ask Bryant Wright, Frank Page or other leaders if this has been done?

Hmmmm....

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

SBC - DOA

Sure, I’ll weigh in on the name change now being studied by the blue ribbon, select, committee of SBC men and a couple of wives of men .

“Baptist” is the third rail in SBC denominational life. Touch it and you die. If there is any thought, any hint of a thought, any whisper of a hint of a thought to jettison the term “Baptist” from Southern Baptist Convention the thing is stone blasted cold - dead on arrival. That’s spelled SBC-DOA.

We’ve gone down this road before. Baptist Press reports 1965, 1974, 1983, 1989, 1990, 1998, 1999, and 2004. That’s about once ever five years. We are overdue by that measure. Problem for those who are indignant that the matter has even been brought up again is that no vote of any SBC in session precludes the matter being raised in future years. Call it unwise. Say it shouldn’t be done. But don’t say that Bryant Wright cannot raise the question again.

Money is an issue. This committee has no funding, thank God, and they will serve at their own expense. But the matter of the cost of a name change is a serious one. In a time of budget and personnel cuts and of the steady erosion of Cooperative Program giving, how much funding can we devote to this? What brash, optimistic SBCer would speculate that we are talking less than millions of dollars for the legal work plus a media campaign that is well nigh indispensable to the effort. And if better public relations is driving this possible name change is better PR a slippery and elusive goal? How long will national media note that the new XYZ Convention is the former SBC? A long, long time.

"Southern" seems to be the main culprit. We are heavily Southern and we are Baptist. We could call it the Aspirational National Baptist Convention since being non-southern is more an aspiration than a reality. While we like to remind folks that the Southern Baptist Convention is no longer Southern but rather has churches in every state, fact is that 82% of SBC churches and 86% of SBC members are in fifteen southern states: AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, MO, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV (astute students will count in that list all of the states of the Confederacy, two border states, one breakaway state, and one territory. A witty friend has suggested CBF: Confederate Baptist Fellowship. Now that would be cooperation with our moderate friends.).

It keeps coming back and I share some sympathy with my friends who are indignant that the matter has to be dredged up every few years but I see no solution to it. It’s like fighting a liquor referendum: Opponents have to vote it down repeatedly, forever, while proponents just have to win once. Sorry about that.

Perhaps the most compelling reason not to change the name of the good old SBC mother ship is because a very prominent blogger would then have to change the name of his blog: SBCPlodder.

Alas and alack! What sleepless nights await Plodder who must now try to cope with the possibility that his name might become obsolete. OTOH, I am becoming obsolete...