Shall it be “GCB Plodder” instead of SBC Plodder?
Uh…no.
I rather like beginning our name with the hiss of the sibilant “S” in Ssssssouthern Baptist Convention. Doesn’t SsssssssBC roll nicely right off the tongue? Sort of a soft 'hisssss'.
Speaking of which, veteran SBCers are able detect a steady hiss of disapproval for any significant idea put forth from on high in the Sssssouthern Baptist Convention and the hissing of bloggers far and wide is constant in our Baptist background. I hear it on the non-name change.
I sense ambivalence about the matter, although not a few approve of the action since it gives us a way for churches to avoid enunciating the “S” word if they think it harmful.
Since I don’t deal with people who instinctively hold me at arms length when they find out I am SBC, I make no judgment about the advantage of a nickname for the SBC. Should some feel it helpful, I’m for going along.
Would anyone dispute that we have a way in the SBC of taking perfectly good terms and phrases and absolutely wearing them out. I offer as evidence the ubiquitous Baptist term “missions.” In my state every nickel that is spent is “missions” and every employee is a state “missionary.”
Get the point?
But I’m trying to imagine a conversation about the nickname.
And we've got a disconnect here. If the purpose is both avoid negative reaction to SBC and also to create a good impression, "Great Commission Baptists" fails because it is far too obscure to all but those with a much higher level of Biblical familiarity. "Golden Rule Baptists" would work for this because the phrase is familiar to almost all.
And doesn't the name “Great Commission Baptists” sound decidedly generic? Insiders think and speak of autonomy but the greater public thinks of the SBC as being heavily institutionalized. "Great Commission Baptists" sounds like a mob not an organization. Perhaps the committee is onto something there.
One might note the way in which news media, folks who actually get paychecks for reporting news, wrote of the Name Change Committee’s recommendation to the Executive Committee:
The headline news is that there will be no name change for the SBC, not that we have an add-on name.
Time will tell if the alternative name dies a quiet death or lives on with some degree of usefulness. I'm leaning towards the former.
Regardless, I will not be using the alternative name. If others find some value in it, God bless them.
Uh…no.
I rather like beginning our name with the hiss of the sibilant “S” in Ssssssouthern Baptist Convention. Doesn’t SsssssssBC roll nicely right off the tongue? Sort of a soft 'hisssss'.
Speaking of which, veteran SBCers are able detect a steady hiss of disapproval for any significant idea put forth from on high in the Sssssouthern Baptist Convention and the hissing of bloggers far and wide is constant in our Baptist background. I hear it on the non-name change.
I sense ambivalence about the matter, although not a few approve of the action since it gives us a way for churches to avoid enunciating the “S” word if they think it harmful.
Since I don’t deal with people who instinctively hold me at arms length when they find out I am SBC, I make no judgment about the advantage of a nickname for the SBC. Should some feel it helpful, I’m for going along.
Would anyone dispute that we have a way in the SBC of taking perfectly good terms and phrases and absolutely wearing them out. I offer as evidence the ubiquitous Baptist term “missions.” In my state every nickel that is spent is “missions” and every employee is a state “missionary.”
Get the point?
But I’m trying to imagine a conversation about the nickname.
“Oh, I’m a Great Commission Baptist.”
“What’s that?”
“Well, it’s what some of us call the Southern Baptist Convention.”
The dilemma is inescapable here. When the question is asked about what, who Great Commission Baptists are, the answer has to be forthright. I wouldn't do to finesse it and deliberately hold back on connecting it to the SBC, and thereby appear deceitful.
“I see.”
“You do?”
“Not really, but whatever.”
And we've got a disconnect here. If the purpose is both avoid negative reaction to SBC and also to create a good impression, "Great Commission Baptists" fails because it is far too obscure to all but those with a much higher level of Biblical familiarity. "Golden Rule Baptists" would work for this because the phrase is familiar to almost all.
And doesn't the name “Great Commission Baptists” sound decidedly generic? Insiders think and speak of autonomy but the greater public thinks of the SBC as being heavily institutionalized. "Great Commission Baptists" sounds like a mob not an organization. Perhaps the committee is onto something there.
One might note the way in which news media, folks who actually get paychecks for reporting news, wrote of the Name Change Committee’s recommendation to the Executive Committee:
“Southern Baptists decide against name change”
“Southern Baptists will officially remain Southern Baptists”
“No Name Change For Southern Baptists”
The headline news is that there will be no name change for the SBC, not that we have an add-on name.
Time will tell if the alternative name dies a quiet death or lives on with some degree of usefulness. I'm leaning towards the former.
Regardless, I will not be using the alternative name. If others find some value in it, God bless them.